Lending Against Tokenized Assets: Aave Horizon, Morpho, Kamino, Exchange Margin and Your Own Market
Six routes to credit against a tokenized fund, loan or reinsurance token, compared on who may borrow, what each takes as collateral and the loan-to-value ratio (LTV), the share of collateral value a borrower can draw: Aave Horizon, Morpho, Kamino, exchange and prime-broker margin, bank collateral networks, and a market of your own, with amounts read on 18 October 2026.

Reviewed by Luis Medeiros, Field CTO at Protofire · Updated October 2026
Tokenized Treasury and money market funds such as BlackRock's BUIDL and Circle's USYC are accepted as derivatives margin by exchanges, Deribit at a 2% haircut, while Morpho, Kamino and Aave Horizon hold almost none: the tokenized collateral behind their stablecoin loans is mostly loan-backed, credit, carry and reinsurance tokens. On 18 October 2026, Morpho's 59 listed markets for these tokens held about $657.2 million of loans, $186.1 million in one PRIME market; Kamino's ONyc, AUTO and PRIME markets held $223.9 million and Horizon $121.4 million, next to rwa.xyz's $8.15 billion of distributed tokenized credit. LTVs reach 90% on Horizon (Treasury funds, GHO loans), 88% on Kamino (PRIME) and 98% on Morpho (quickly redeemed wrapped funds). Collateral that none of these venues lists needs a market built for it.
On an Arenas market, Protofire earns 10% of the interest borrowers pay, whatever the liquidity source, plus a small license and maintenance fee per market, so we gain when lending on that route grows. Arenas is the white-label stack we build on a forked Aave V3 deployment for the sixth option, a market of your own; a token that already fits Horizon, Morpho or Kamino needs no build. Luis Medeiros, who reviewed this page and is quoted in one answer, is Protofire's Field CTO and is introduced on the Roundtable as CEO of Arenas.fi. Protofire is an onchain engineering firm founded in 2016 that lends nothing, holds no client assets, has no license to provide financial services and gives no legal advice here. Fund token issuers are compared in our fund tokenization providers guide.
Which route takes which collateral, at what LTV, and who liquidates it?
6 options side by side: scroll the table sideways to see all of them.
Which venues take tokenized funds and loan tokens as collateral, and how much was borrowed against them on 18 October 2026?
Aave Horizon
- +Five named institutional funds in use as collateral on 18 Oct 2026: Bitwise USCC, Janus Henderson JAAA, Midas mGLOBAL, Invesco USTB and VanEck VBILL
- +LTVs of 86 to 88% for Treasury and AAA CLO funds, up to 90% for GHO loans, set by Aave's risk stewards against each fund's redemption record
- +Anyone can supply Ripple's RLUSD, Aave's GHO or USDC, so lenders are not limited to allowlisted investors
- +Issuer NAV prices arrive through Chainlink inside LlamaRisk's upper and lower bounds, which reject out-of-range updates
- +No incident found in Horizon to 19 Oct 2026
- −Ethereum only, with three borrow assets
- −Total value locked (TVL), which on DefiLlama excludes loans, fell from $420.9M on 12 Jan 2026 to $254.3M on 18 Oct 2026
- −Three of the eight listed funds sit at or near zero (USYC, JTRSY, ACRED); HINC passed its Snapshot vote on 2 Oct 2026 but was not yet listed, and mWIN is still a proposal
- −Every new fund needs an Aave governance proposal (ARFC) with LlamaRisk and Aave Labs assessments and a binding Snapshot vote
Aave Labs launched Horizon on 26 August 2025 as "a new lending market on Ethereum where institutions or other qualified users borrow stablecoins against real-world assets (RWAs)", built on Aave Protocol version 3.3. Its governance proposal calls it "a licensed instance of Aave V3" and shares reserve-factor revenue, Aave's cut of borrower interest, and GHO revenue 50/50 with the Aave DAO. Qualified investors supply fund tokens and borrow; anyone can supply stablecoins. Compliance sits in each fund token's own allowlist, the issuer's list of wallets allowed to hold it. Collateral positions are non-transferable receipt tokens (aTokens), and an issuer can move a user's position to a new wallet or stop it borrowing more. Horizon is not the first permissioned Aave market: Aave Arc opened in January 2022 with 30 institutions whitelisted by Fireblocks and is now close to empty, at $0.06 million on DefiLlama.
On 18 October 2026 Horizon's contracts listed eight collateral funds, and DefiLlama showed five in use. The Bitwise Crypto Carry Fund (USCC) held $56.5 million and the Janus Henderson AAA CLO Fund (JAAA) $51.9 million. Midas mGLOBAL held $30.7 million, filling its 30 million token cap; Invesco's USTB, on Superstate's platform, $10.7 million; and VanEck's VBILL $1.25 million. Circle's USYC and Janus Henderson's JTRSY sat near zero, and Apollo's ACRED has a supply cap of one token. Borrowers had drawn $121.4 million against $151.0 million of RWA collateral, mostly RLUSD at a variable 3.25% APR. TVL, which excludes loans, stood at $254.3 million against $420.9 million on 12 January 2026. In Horizon's first week LlamaRisk wrote that "market growth is currently constrained by the RWA supply side", since only allowlisted investors hold the funds.
Horizon sets each fund's LTV by how quickly the fund pays out redemptions. USTB, USYC and VBILL borrow at up to 88% LTV, JAAA at 87%, USCC at 85% and ACRED at 66%, and GHO loans get 1 to 3 points more in each fund's e-mode, an Aave category with its own borrow list and LTV (90% for USTB, USYC and VBILL); mGLOBAL borrows only in an e-mode, at 75%. Aave's risk stewards raised JAAA from 81% to 87% on 15 October 2026 after the fund paid 91 of 93 redemption orders (USD 717.3 million) on the day of the request or the next business day, sizing the risk "against a three-business-day exit window". Prices are the issuer's NAV, and Aave's docs say an update outside the preset bounds is rejected. Liquidation needs an approved buyer: "RWA liquidators, typically market makers, must meet issuer-defined investor requirements".
Listing goes through Aave governance. Since 14 August 2026 each new fund needs an Asset Listing ARFC with a business case, a LlamaRisk risk assessment, an Aave Labs technical assessment and a binding Snapshot vote. Neuberger's HINC passed its binding Snapshot vote on 2 October 2026 but was not yet listed on 18 October, Wellington's mWIN, through Midas, was still under discussion, and the HINC proposal asks how bad debt from an issuer "Executive Action" would be allocated. Aave's rsETH incident report of April 2026 lists Horizon as unaffected by the incident, which hit Aave's core market.
Morpho
- +The most borrowing against fund, credit and reinsurance tokens: about $657.2M across 59 listed markets on 18 Oct 2026
- +Anyone can create a market with its own collateral, loan asset, oracle and liquidation LTV, with no governance vote
- +Vaults V2 (29 Sep 2025) let an issuer or lender deploy its own vault, hold the owner role, appoint a curator and add a KYC gate
- +Liquidation LTVs up to 98% for wrapped funds that redeem quickly, such as wUSCC and wJAAA
- +No incident found in its RWA markets to 19 Oct 2026
- −Concentrated: one PRIME/PYUSD market, funded by a single Sentora vault, holds $186.1M of Morpho's borrowing against these tokens
- −Markets for BUIDL, USTB, USDY, JTRSY, VBILL and USYC, created 12 Apr 2026, hold $0, and Apollo's sACRED market a few dollars
- −A market no curator funds has no lenders, so an issuer has to recruit one or fund it itself
- −Balances swing: Morpho counted close to $190M of mF-ONE in Oct 2025, against $31.0M posted on 18 Oct 2026
Morpho Blue, which Morpho's docs now call Variable Rate Markets, lets anyone create a market: an isolated pool with one collateral and one loan asset. A market is set by five parameters: collateral, loan asset, oracle, interest rate model and liquidation LTV. The last comes from a governance-approved list (0, 38.5, 62.5, 77, 86, 91.5, 94.5, 96.5 or 98%) and is the most a borrower can draw; the only approved rate model is variable. Lenders reach markets through vaults whose curators choose the markets to fund. Since Vaults V2 launched on 29 September 2025, an owner handles governance, a curator sets risk parameters, an allocator moves liquidity and a sentinel can step in, and optional gate contracts can require KYC. On Morpho's API on 18 October 2026, 35 of 3,650 Vault V2 contracts had a gate, holding $117.1 million. For fund collateral, KYC is enforced by the token or its wrapper, so the market itself stays permissionless. Coinbase runs its borrowing product, whose loans are secured by crypto such as cbBTC and ETH, on Morpho markets, and its lending product through Steakhouse-curated Morpho vaults that lend into the same markets.
Morpho Blue held $10.96 billion of TVL and $5.60 billion of loans on DefiLlama that day. Its 59 listed markets with fund, credit, reinsurance or share tokens as collateral held about $657.2 million of those loans against $887.0 million of collateral, more than any other venue here, and about half of it sat against two tokens. The PRIME/PYUSD market, created on 8 May 2026 for Figure's home-equity-loan token issued through Hastra, held $186.1 million, funded by one Sentora vault. Re's reUSD, a senior tranche token whose capital funds Re's partner reinsurers, backed $139.3 million, $129.3 million of it as PT-reUSD, a Pendle principal token that works like a zero-coupon bond on reUSD and matures on 10 December 2026. Smaller markets, each listed with its amount in the table below, take Huma's PST, Midas's mGLO, 3Jane's USD3, Fasanara's mF-ONE and USD.AI's sUSDai. USD3 is the senior tranche of a credit pool whose primary backing is financing for US fintech lenders, and sUSDai is a claim on assets that include GPU-collateralized loans.
Wrapped funds that redeem quickly run at a 98% liquidation LTV: wUSCC ($7.1 million borrowed) and wJAAA, which holds the permissioned JAAA token. Spiko's EUTBL, a euro money market fund, backs a $2.65 million EURCV market at 96.5%, part of the program SG-FORGE announced on 30 September 2025 with MEV Capital as curator. Markets for BUIDL, USTB, USDY, JTRSY, VBILL and USYC, all created on 12 April 2026, held $0, and Apollo's sACRED market a few dollars. Morpho's October 2025 count of close to $190 million of mF-ONE compares with $31.0 million of mF-ONE collateral on 18 October 2026. Fixed rates came on 21 July 2026 with Morpho Midnight, which Morpho says "isn't a 'V2' of Morpho Blue" and which launched "scoped to one network (Base), one pair (cbBTC/USDC)"; it has since added Ethereum and held $9.2 million on 18 October 2026, none of it against a tokenized fund.
Prices come from issuer feeds: the RWA markets read adapters over feeds named "USCC NAV", "EUTBL NAV" or "PRIME / WYLDS Exchange Rate", several delivered by Chainlink, while Midas and Pareto run their own. The main risk is a price that the token's own contract sets. Morpho vaults were among the lenders hit when Stream Finance's xUSD collapsed in November 2025 after an external fund manager lost about $93 million. They were hit again when about 80 million unbacked Resolv USR were minted on 22 March 2026 while wstUSR was still priced at its exchange rate. No incident in Morpho's RWA markets was found to 19 October 2026.
Kamino (Solana)
- +Issuer-specific markets: $223.9M borrowed against ONyc, AUTO and PRIME on 18 Oct 2026, with $330.3M of the three posted
- +High LTVs for loan-backed tokens: PRIME 88% (91% liquidation threshold), Huma PST 82%, AUTO 78%
- +Optional permissioned markets limit depositors and borrowers to KYC'd wallets while withdrawals and repayments stay open
- +Borrow in USDC, PYUSD, CASH or USDG against issuer NAV prices, such as Chainlink's onchain NAV for ONyc
- −Solana only, so an Ethereum-issued fund needs a Solana share class first
- −Balances swing: Kamino's PRIME collateral fell from $330.1M on 1 Apr 2026 to $87.6M on 18 Oct 2026
- −Treasury funds are absent or empty: USTB holds about $2, Apollo's market takes no new borrowing, and USDY, OUSG, BUIDL, BENJI, USYC and VBILL are not listed
- −Kamino warns that RWA collateral may not liquidate as fast as onchain assets in a stress scenario
Kamino runs isolated borrow markets on Solana: "Each Kamino Borrow market is a self-contained environment with its own accepted collateral assets, borrowable assets, risk parameters, and liquidity." A curator can make a market permissioned, open only to KYC'd depositors or to permissioned borrowers, while "Withdraw and repay stay open". For Superstate's tokenized equities the gate sits in the token, which can only be held or received by approved addresses on Superstate's allowlist, whether in a wallet or inside a protocol such as Kamino. Superstate says Kamino use is not available in the US. Kamino Lend held $1.307 billion of TVL and $904.8 million of loans on DefiLlama on 18 October 2026.
Each large tokenized-credit issuer has its own market. The same day, OnRe's market held $154.9 million of ONyc, a reinsurance-backed token priced through Chainlink's onchain NAV, at 66% LTV and a 75% liquidation threshold. Figure's market held $87.6 million of PRIME at 88% LTV, where USDC cost 5.38% at a reading that evening. PRIME on Kamino peaked at $330.1 million on 1 April 2026, and Kamino holds about three quarters of the PRIME supply on Solana. Figure's AUTO token, backed by near-prime auto loans, held $87.8 million at 78% LTV, its highest so far, in a market open since 6 July 2026. Borrowers had drawn $223.9 million in the three markets. Smaller markets for Huma's PST and Superstate's tokenized Forward Industries shares (FWDI) are listed in the table below, and Maple's syrupUSDC, which this page does not count, backed $55.8 million at 88%. Treasury funds are the gap: USTB is listed at 90% LTV with about $2 deposited, Apollo's market takes no new borrowing, and USDY, OUSG, BUIDL, BENJI, USYC and VBILL were not found.
Kamino's documentation on RWA loops warns that "The collateral may not be liquidatable as rapidly as on-chain assets in a stress scenario". Two smaller Solana venues lend against the same kinds of token. Jupiter Lend held about $60 million of Huma PST in two vaults and about $60 million of USD.AI's sUSDai in one on 18 October 2026, and accepts syrupUSDC at a 90% collateral factor. Loopscale, an order book for fixed-rate, fixed-duration loans, lists ACRED, ONyc, syrupUSDC and SPYx as collateral in its docs, last updated 26 May 2026. A fund issued on Ethereum reaches these markets only through a Solana share class; how institutions weigh Solana against Ethereum and other networks is set out in our institutional blockchains guide.
Exchange and prime-broker margin
- +Accepts the largest Treasury funds, of which lending markets hold almost none: BUIDL and USYC, with $2.17B and $2.39B of fund assets on 18 Oct 2026, and Franklin Templeton's Benji funds
- +Low published haircuts: 2% for BUIDL and USYC at Deribit, cut from 10% in Jan 2026, and 1% for BUIDL at Crypto.com
- +Off-exchange custody: Binance's pledged fund units stay with Ceffu or a triparty bank while their value is mirrored on the exchange
- +The fund keeps paying its yield while posted, the selling point Circle gives for USYC on Binance
- −Margin credit for derivatives positions, not a cash or stablecoin loan
- −Bilateral onboarding with each venue; Binance publishes no haircut, and no venue publishes how much is posted
- −Institutional clients only, with jurisdiction limits: Deribit is not available in the US, and Crypto.com's BUIDL terms vary by jurisdiction
- −Few funds and venues: BUIDL, USYC and Benji funds at Binance, Deribit, Crypto.com and OKX, whose mirroring with Standard Chartered added BUIDL in Apr 2026 and runs in Dubai
Exchanges accept the largest tokenized Treasury funds as margin for derivatives positions and hold them in one of two ways. In the off-exchange model, Binance accepted Circle's USYC on 24 July 2025, BlackRock's BUIDL on 14 November 2025 and Franklin Templeton's Benji money market fund shares on 11 February 2026, held with the custodian Ceffu or, for USYC and BUIDL, a triparty bank, which holds the units for both sides. Ceffu says pledged BUIDL is "locked in the client's Qualified Wallet and cannot be withdrawn while the mirror position remains open", and Cointelegraph reported that pledged Benji shares "are not rehypothecated or transferred onto the exchange". Binance publishes no haircut.
In the on-exchange model the tokens sit at the venue. Deribit's public API lists BUIDL and USYC in its cross-collateral pool, with a 2% haircut on each in its schedule updated on 28 September 2026, cut from 10% in January 2026; a 2% haircut means 98% of the value counts as margin. Deribit has accepted USYC since October 2024 and BUIDL since June 2025, and is not available in the United States. Crypto.com Exchange took BUIDL as trading collateral from 18 June 2025 and cut its haircut from 2% to 1% on 25 March 2026, "subject to jurisdictional limitations". Among prime brokers, FalconX accepted BUIDL as collateral in 2024 and ran a trade with USTB as collateral on 11 June 2024.
On rwa.xyz on 18 October 2026, USYC held $2.39 billion, about 98% of it on BNB Chain, BUIDL $2.17 billion and Franklin's BENJI $680 million, while lending markets held almost none of the three. OKX and Standard Chartered run collateral mirroring for tokenized money market funds as a pilot under Dubai's VARA framework, with Franklin Templeton the first fund provider (April 2025), and on 28 April 2026 OKX added BlackRock's BUIDL, which its VIP and institutional clients can hold off-exchange at Standard Chartered while trading on OKX Middle East. No venue publishes how much tokenized collateral its clients have posted, and each onboards clients and funds one by one. Ethena's USDtb holds BUIDL as stablecoin reserve backing, a use this page does not count as collateral.
Bank collateral networks
- +Live at scale for repo: Broadridge's Distributed Ledger Repo processed $7.5T in Sep 2026, $359B a day
- +J.P. Morgan's Kinexys TCN moves ownership of money market fund shares as collateral without moving the underlying assets
- +US and UK margin paths for tokenized money market funds: the CFTC staff FAQ (24 Sep 2026) and FCA PS26/7 (30 Apr 2026)
- +Haircuts can follow the underlying fund's, adjusted for settlement-time differences, under CFTC staff letter 25-39
- −Most live volume is repo or securities recorded on DLT; no network discloses tokenized fund units pledged at scale
- −No Kinexys TCN volume is disclosed, and BNY and Goldman say their fund tokens would enable collateral use only in the future
- −The US position is staff guidance, an FAQ in which staff would not object, not a Commission rule or no-action letter
- −DTCC's Tokenization Service and Collateral AppChain and CME and BMO's tokenized cash were scheduled or pending approval, with no launch found by 19 Oct 2026
- −Open only to banks, dealers, CCPs, futures commission merchants (FCMs) and their clients
J.P. Morgan describes its Tokenized Collateral Network as a way to "Transfer collateral ownership without moving assets in underlying ledgers, while remaining invested", starting with money market funds. Its first client trade, reported in October 2023, moved tokenized shares of a BlackRock money market fund to Barclays as collateral for an OTC derivatives trade. J.P. Morgan cited "live collateral capabilities through the Tokenized Collateral Network" for an award in August 2026 but discloses no volume for it. The largest live volume is repo: Broadridge's Distributed Ledger Repo processed $7.5 trillion in September 2026, $359 billion a day, of repo in securities recorded on a ledger, with no fund token pledged. Eurex Clearing launched a DLT collateral service with HQLAx on 29 July 2025, and the Eurosystem has accepted DLT-issued securities held in CSDs from 30 March 2026; both cover securities, and neither takes fund units.
US and UK regulators have opened margin paths. A CFTC rule effective 17 August 2026 removed the "asset transfer restriction" that kept many money market funds out of uncleared-swap initial margin. The CFTC Divisions' FAQ of 24 September 2026 then said staff "would not object" to tokenized money market fund shares as initial or variation margin for uncleared swaps, if the underlying fund qualifies and the tokens grant "legal and economic rights that are the same or functionally equivalent". The Commission itself has issued no rule or no-action letter on it. Staff letter 25-39 of December 2025 had said haircuts can follow the underlying asset, "subject to adjustment for any settlement-time differences". In the UK, the FCA's PS26/7 of 30 April 2026 confirmed eligible money market funds, "including tokenised MMFs", as collateral for uncleared trades under UK EMIR. For a bank's own capital, the Basel cryptoasset standard recognizes a token as collateral only if it is a tokenized version of an instrument on the CRE22 list of eligible financial collateral (SCO60.30).
Much of the rest is scheduled or exploratory. DTCC said its Tokenization Service would launch in October 2026 and its Collateral AppChain in Q4 2026, after production trades on 15 July 2026 with more than 30 firms that included collateral pledges and CCP margin workflows; no launch had been announced by 19 October. BMO's tokenized cash for CME margin was due in the second half of 2026, pending regulatory approval, with no launch found by 19 October; how bank-issued tokenized cash of this kind compares with stablecoins is set out in our tokenized deposits vs stablecoins guide. An ISDA and GDF report of 7 July 2026, built on feedback from over 120 firms, examines whether tokenized money market funds can serve as derivatives collateral under existing US law. Goldman Sachs said the mirror tokens of fund shares it launched with BNY "would enable us to unlock their utility as a form of collateral" in the future. Opening a call for evidence on CCP collateral on 9 October 2026, ESMA wrote that "tokenisation does not remove the underlying legal, credit, market, liquidity or operational risks".
Your own marketProtofire's model
- +Takes collateral no shared market lists, such as one originator's loan book, under your own LTV, liquidation and borrow-asset rules
- +Deploys on the EVM chain you choose, including a private bank network, where Horizon, Morpho and Kamino run only on the public chains they have deployed to
- +You set the loan asset, rate model and term; a fixed-term loan against tokenized Treasury funds, which no venue offered at meaningful size on 19 Oct 2026, can be built in
- −You bring the lenders: Flux Finance had $34.7M borrowed on 18 Oct 2026 after more than three years, and Aave Arc, opened for 30 whitelisted institutions in 2022, held $0.06M; Arenas can also draw on Aave V3 credit delegation, which still needs Aave suppliers willing to delegate
- −Fork licenses bind: Aave V4 needs an Aave Labs license for production, and Aave v3.3 to v3.7 carry Business Source License (BUSL) use-grant conditions until 6 Mar 2027 at the latest; which of them apply to a white-label stack, Arenas included, depends on the Aave version it forks
- −NAV bounds, which LlamaRisk sets on Horizon, and market selection, which Morpho's curators do, fall to the operator, with liquidators the allowlist admits and an audit of every change to forked code
- −A firm lending to others needs a license where it lends; outside a bank license there is no EU passport for lending
- −A branded product needs no fork: Coinbase runs its loans on Morpho markets that Steakhouse-curated vaults lend into, and a Vault V2 owner can add a KYC gate with no license terms or forked code to audit
A market of your own fits three kinds of firm: an originator whose collateral no shared market lists, such as a single book of loans or a token with a lockup; a lender or fintech that wants clients to borrow under its own brand, credit policy and rates; and a bank lending to its own clients. There are four ways to run one. Two sit on the venues above and are covered there: an issuer or lender can create a Morpho market and fund it from its own Vault V2, as Sentora funds the PRIME market, or a curator can run an isolated or permissioned Kamino market. The other two mean deploying contracts of your own.
A market of your own on contracts you deploy is either a licensed Aave instance or a fork. A licensed instance, as Horizon is, sends half of its reserve-factor revenue to the Aave DAO; Aave V4's institutional spokes were still moving through Aave governance in October 2026. The other form is a fork or white-label stack. Ondo's Flux Finance, "a fork of Compound V2" that lends stablecoins against OUSG, has run since 8 February 2023 and had $34.7 million borrowed on 18 October 2026.
For a market of your own on forked code, the code license decides which stacks can be used. Aave V4's license says "Any use of the Licensed Work, or any Derivative thereof, in a Production Environment is strictly prohibited", unless Aave Labs, at the direction of Aave governance, grants a waiver or commercial license. Aave v3.3 to v3.7, the versions behind Horizon and aave-v3-origin, are under the Business Source License with a use grant. Its conditions include not helping to migrate "users and/or funds from the Aave ecosystem" and not having deployed a competing Aave fork in the preceding four years, and the DAO can waive them. That grant applies until the earlier of 6 March 2027 or a date set by governance; the original 2022 Aave V3 core is now MIT. Euler's vault kit is under the Business Source License with no additional use grant and a stated change date of 24 April 2029. Morpho's core contract is GPL-2.0-or-later and its other files MIT.
Protofire's Arenas is a white-label stack: a forked Aave V3 deployment with a factory that launches isolated markets, each with its own collateral type, LTV and liquidation settings, open or KYC/KYB-gated. Before the first loan in a market of your own, on any stack, name the liquidators the token's allowlist admits and agree the redemption route with the issuer, set the NAV feed's bounds and staleness rule, and decide who absorbs the debt if the issuer freezes a position, the question the HINC proposal put to Aave. A firm lending to others also needs a license where it lends: in Germany, granting cash loans is banking business under the KWG, and consumer credit up to EUR 100,000 comes under the revised Consumer Credit Directive from 20 November 2026.
Which lending markets and margin programs took tokenized assets as collateral in October 2026?
How we counted: a token counts if its issuer gives holders a claim on a fund, a pool of loans or receivables, or reinsurance capital held off-chain, or on company shares; wrapped versions and Pendle principal tokens of it count too. The rule is the same on every venue: it takes in OnRe's ONyc and Re's reUSD (reinsurance), USD.AI's sUSDai (GPU-backed loans) and 3Jane's USD3 (fintech credit), and leaves out stablecoins and their staked or savings versions, vaults that manage a basket of other tokens, gold tokens, and Maple's syrup tokens, credit lent against crypto, with $211.0 million borrowed against them on Morpho. A lending market qualifies if it held more than $1 million of counted collateral or loans in reads of Morpho's and Kamino's APIs, Jupiter's API, DefiLlama and Aave's contracts on 18 October 2026; Morpho totals cover listed markets with more than $1,000 borrowed. Not shown as rows: on Morpho, mM1-USD, mROX, Wintermute's Wildcat credit token wmtUSDC (two markets, $7.1 million), Pareto's AA FalconX tranche, mGLOeuro, two smaller PRIME markets, Midas's Hyperithm BTC token, AUTO, nvPRIME and 19 markets under $1 million each for other Midas, Spiko, Nest, Valos, Groma, Centrifuge and Asseto tokens and tokenized stocks (about $46 million of loans in all, inside the $657.2 million total); on Kamino, reUSD, sUSDai, Nest's nOPAL, Obligate's oTFY, xStocks shares and a PT-ONyc reserve, each under $10 million; reUSD and xStocks on Jupiter Lend; Term Finance's PT-reUSD ($3.2 million); and Gearbox's Midas tokens (about $2 million). Left out as empty: Morpho's BUIDL, USTB, USDY, JTRSY, VBILL and USYC markets ($0, created 12 April 2026, not listed by Morpho) and sACRED (a few dollars); Horizon's USYC, JTRSY and ACRED (about $0); Kamino's USTB (about $2) and Apollo market (no new borrowing); and Euler's KPK RWA vault (162 USDC). Morpho and Flux rows show loans; Horizon, Kamino, Jupiter and Fluid rows show collateral supplied; exchanges and banks publish no amounts, so their rows show the haircut or status. These definitions differ, so the rows should not be added together. Sources: DefiLlama, Morpho's API, Kamino's API and the venue releases cited in the sections above.
Which route fits your token or your loan book?
your fund runs on Ethereum, redeems within a few business days and can pass an ARFC and a Snapshot vote, and your holders want variable-rate RLUSD, GHO or USDC loans from Horizon's open pool of stablecoin lenders.
you can recruit a curator or fund the market from your own vault, as Sentora funds the PRIME/PYUSD market; a market no curator funds stays empty, as Morpho's six Treasury-token markets were in October 2026.
your token lives on Solana and you want a market of its own, as OnRe and Figure each have for their tokens, permissioned to KYC'd wallets if needed.
your holders trade derivatives and need margin for them, and your fund is one of the few the venues list: BUIDL at Deribit, Crypto.com, Binance and OKX, USYC at Deribit and Binance, and Franklin Templeton funds at Binance and OKX.
your counterparties post margin under CFTC or UK EMIR rules and use Kinexys or a CCP's ledger service; the US path is staff guidance, and DTCC's and CME's services were not yet live on 19 October 2026.
no shared market takes your collateral, or you lend to your own clients, and a Morpho market funded from your own vault will not do; you recruit the lenders and carry the oracle, liquidation and license work.
Which other lenders, wrappers and bank programs touch tokenized collateral?
- Euler's permissioned vaults: Euler launched vaults for permissioned assets with Securitize and KPK on 1 June 2026, where only an approved liquidator can receive seized collateral ("If the recipient is not approved, the collateral transfer fails"). Euler's claim that "For the first time in DeFi, tokenized securities can serve as productive collateral" came after Horizon and Morpho's sACRED market. KPK's USDC Prime RWA vault lists VBILL at 90% LTV but held no collateral and 162 USDC of deposits on 18 October 2026, and Euler's vault kit is under the Business Source License with a 2029 change date.
- Fluid's vaults: under this page's counting rule, Fluid held about $292 million of collateral on DefiLlama on 18 October 2026: about $211 million of USD.AI's sUSDai across Arbitrum, Ethereum, Plasma and Base, $45 million of Huma PST and $36 million of Re's reUSD, none of it a tokenized Treasury or CLO fund. In the Resolv incident of March 2026, Fluid absorbed over $10 million of bad debt.
- Spark, Grove and Maple: none runs a market that lends against tokenized funds. Grove buys them with Sky liquidity, $1.40 billion on DefiLlama on 18 October 2026, including JAAA ($394.5 million), JTRSY ($309.9 million) and BUIDL ($119.5 million), and it has also supplied RLUSD to Horizon as a lender. Spark moved its BUIDL and JTRSY holdings to Grove in July 2025, and SparkLend lists no RWA collateral. Maple lends to institutions against BTC and ETH and, through Zodia's Interchange, SOL; its syrup tokens are themselves collateral on Aave, Kamino, Jupiter and Morpho, with $211.0 million borrowed against them on Morpho.
- Wrappers that make a fund composable: Centrifuge's deJAAA and deJTRSY, freely transferable versions of the Janus Henderson funds, held about $9.5 million and $10.7 million on Centrifuge's API at 15 October 2026 prices, about 2% and 3% of the two funds' supply, and Morpho's deJAAA markets held about $0. A wrapper that holds the permissioned token itself, such as wJAAA, backs a $2.2 million Morpho market. How permissioned standards such as ERC-3643 and open ERC-20s trade reach for control is compared in our RWA token standards guide.
- Bank Lombard loans: the bank programs live today lend against native crypto. Sygnum lends against more than 20 tokens, and Luzerner Kantonalbank has accepted BTC and ETH as Lombard collateral since 25 September 2025. For tokenized funds, DBS says that "In the next phase of the partnership, DBS will explore helping clients unlock liquidity by using their sgBENJI tokens as collateral" (DBS, September 2025).
- For a bank, broker or fund manager: the crypto-backed Lombard loans blueprint lays out the regulated version a bank or broker runs, lending fiat or stablecoins against pledged crypto under ESMA's June 2026 Q&A and the consumer credit rules that apply from 20 November 2026. The private credit fund with borrowing against units blueprint starts from the AIFMD valuation duty that caps how often an illiquid fund's NAV can move onchain, and agrees the whitelisted liquidator set before the first unit is pledged.
FAQ
What is lending against tokenized assets?
Lending against tokenized assets is credit secured by a token that represents a fund unit, a Treasury product, a pool of loans, reinsurance capital or a share, where the lender holds the token as collateral and can sell or redeem it if the loan goes bad. It takes three forms: exchange margin, onchain stablecoin loans and collateral moved between banks.
Margin credit comes from exchanges and prime brokers, stablecoin loans from onchain lending markets such as Aave Horizon, Morpho and Kamino, and collateral moves between banks and dealers on networks such as J.P. Morgan's Kinexys. Because most fund tokens can be held only by allowlisted investors, the lender prices them from the issuer's NAV rather than a market price, and a liquidation needs a buyer the allowlist admits or a redemption through the issuer.
Can I borrow against BlackRock's BUIDL or another tokenized money market fund, and at what haircut?
BlackRock's BUIDL and similar tokenized money market funds are borrowed against mainly as derivatives margin at exchanges, at published haircuts of 1 to 2%, while onchain lending markets hold almost none of them. Deribit's schedule, updated on 28 September 2026, sets a 2% haircut for BUIDL and Circle's USYC, down from 10% before January 2026, and Crypto.com cut its BUIDL haircut from 2% to 1% on 25 March 2026.
Binance accepts BUIDL, USYC and Franklin Templeton's Benji funds as off-exchange collateral held at Ceffu or a triparty bank and publishes no haircut, and OKX takes BUIDL held off-exchange at Standard Chartered. No venue publishes the amount posted; the evidence is the funds' size, USYC's 98% share on BNB Chain and the near-zero balances in onchain lending markets. Morpho's BUIDL, USYC, USTB and JTRSY markets, created on 12 April 2026, held $0 on 18 October 2026, and on Aave Horizon USYC and JTRSY sat near zero while Invesco's USTB backed $10.7 million. Ondo's OUSG backs loans on Ondo's own Flux Finance market. How these funds compare with stablecoins as a place to hold dollars is covered in tokenized treasuries vs stablecoins.
Which DeFi protocols accept tokenized Treasuries or private credit as collateral?
Morpho, Kamino, Fluid and Aave Horizon are the lending markets holding the most tokenized-fund, credit and reinsurance collateral, with Jupiter Lend and Flux Finance smaller. On 18 October 2026, Horizon held five funds worth $151.0 million, led by USCC and JAAA; Morpho's markets were led by Figure's PRIME, Re's reUSD and Huma's PST; Kamino held ONyc, AUTO and PRIME; and Fluid held about $292 million, mostly USD.AI's sUSDai.
Euler launched permissioned vaults for Securitize funds on 1 June 2026, but its KPK RWA vault held 162 USDC and no collateral on 18 October 2026. Fluid's total includes about $45 million of Huma PST and $36 million of Re's reUSD, and Gearbox held about $2 million of Midas tokens, while Silo and Dolomite showed no live tokenized-fund collateral and SparkLend lists none. Many markets list a fund that no one has supplied, so the dated market table counts only venues holding more than $1 million.
What is the difference between Aave Horizon and Morpho for tokenized collateral?
Aave Horizon is one permissioned Aave V3 market on Ethereum, live since 26 August 2025, where holders each fund's issuer allowlists borrow RLUSD, GHO or USDC against tokenized funds, and each new fund now needs a binding Aave DAO vote. Morpho is permissionless: anyone can create an isolated market for a token without a vote, and lending comes through vaults whose curators choose the markets to fund.
Risk is set in different places. Horizon's risk stewards set each fund's LTV from its redemption record, and issuer NAV prices must stay inside LlamaRisk's bounds; a Morpho market fixes one liquidation LTV from a governance-approved list when it is created, with whatever price feed its creator picks. On Horizon, KYC sits in each fund token's allowlist; on Morpho, in the token, its wrapper or a Vault V2 gate. Horizon lists eight funds, five of them in use. Morpho's 59 listed markets for these tokens lend mostly against loan-backed, credit and reinsurance tokens, and on 18 October 2026 they carried more than five times Horizon's borrowing.
How much is borrowed against tokenized assets onchain?
Borrowing against tokenized assets onchain is small next to the assets themselves. On 18 October 2026, Morpho's 59 listed markets for fund, credit, reinsurance and share tokens held about $657.2 million of loans, Kamino's ONyc, AUTO and PRIME markets $223.9 million and Aave Horizon $121.4 million. rwa.xyz counted $8.15 billion of distributed tokenized credit that day.
rwa.xyz also counted $14.71 billion of tokenized Treasuries, little of it pledged in lending markets. The largest single position is Morpho's PRIME/PYUSD market, $186.1 million borrowed against Figure's home-equity-loan token and funded by one Sentora vault; with two smaller PRIME markets, PRIME is about 29% of Morpho's total. Kamino held $154.9 million of ONyc, $87.8 million of AUTO and $87.6 million of PRIME as collateral. Balances move quickly: PRIME on Kamino fell from $330.1 million on 1 April 2026 to $87.6 million, and Horizon's TVL, which excludes loans, from $420.9 million in January 2026 to $254.3 million.
How do lending markets liquidate a permissioned token?
A lending market liquidates a permissioned token, one that only allowlisted wallets can hold, such as an ERC-3643 token, by passing it to a liquidator the allowlist admits, who then sells it or redeems it with the issuer. On Aave Horizon, "RWA liquidators, typically market makers, must meet issuer-defined investor requirements"; on Euler's Securitize vaults, "If the recipient is not approved, the collateral transfer fails."
How fast a liquidator gets cash depends on the issuer's redemption terms, since these tokens barely trade. Horizon's risk stewards sized JAAA's 87% LTV to a three-business-day exit after the fund paid 91 of 93 redemptions within a business day, and Superstate's USCC redeems on T+1 or T+2. Wrappers widen who can hold the collateral: Morpho's wJAAA holds the permissioned JAAA token, and Centrifuge's freely transferable deJAAA and deJTRSY are about 2 to 3% of supply. Ondo's Flux Finance requires OUSG borrowers to satisfy OUSG's own permissions.
What does a tokenized fund need before a lender accepts it as collateral?
A tokenized fund needs a liquidation path, a price and a legal basis before a lending market, exchange or bank will take it as collateral. Venues have asked for each: liquidators its allowlist admits, a redemption route with a known time to cash, and an onchain NAV feed with bounds, plus a dossier for whoever decides the listing.
In detail, venues have demanded or priced the following. Liquidation: liquidators agreed in advance and a redemption route whose speed sets the LTV. Leverage: an instant-liquidity backstop for high LTVs or looping (borrowing against the fund to buy more of it), since a loop built in one transaction with a flash loan fails without instant mint and redeem. Price: an issuer NAV feed with upper and lower bounds, plus independent valuation and reserve evidence. Legal: token rights the CFTC would call "the same or functionally equivalent" to the share, a legal opinion on the pledge in insolvency, and disclosed issuer powers to freeze or move positions. Last, a wrapper where the venue needs one, and audited contracts on the venue's chain. The firms that tokenize a fund in the first place are compared in our fund tokenization providers guide.
Exit time is one of the questions liquidity providers raise. Luis Medeiros, Protofire's Field CTO and CEO of Arenas.fi, told the Roundtable on 11 June 2026 that they ask "How quick can I withdraw?", and that it "gets even more complicated when we're talking about real world assets that have at least 30, 60, 90 days payback" (Episode 3 of The Protocol Roundtable).
What LTV can a tokenized Treasury or CLO fund get?
A tokenized Treasury or AAA CLO fund gets 86 to 88% LTV on Aave Horizon, 88 to 90% for GHO loans, and up to 98% on Morpho for quickly redeemed wrapped funds. LTV (loan-to-value) is the share of the collateral's value a borrower can draw; the liquidation threshold is the ratio at which liquidation can begin. An exchange haircut is the share of value not counted as margin.
On 18 October 2026, Horizon set USTB, USYC and VBILL at 88%, JAAA at 87% (liquidation at 89%) after a 15 October raise, and JTRSY at 86%; Bitwise's USCC, a crypto carry fund, got 85% and Apollo's ACRED, a private-credit fund, 66%. Morpho sets one liquidation LTV per market from a fixed list, and a borrower can draw up to it: wUSCC and wJAAA run at 98% and Spiko's EUTBL at 96.5%. Kamino lists USTB at 90% but holds about $2 of it. Credit tokens vary: PRIME 88% LTV on Kamino and an 86% liquidation LTV on Morpho, AUTO 78% and ONyc 66% on Kamino.
How is a tokenized fund priced inside a lending market?
A tokenized fund is priced inside a lending market from the issuer's reported NAV, delivered by an oracle, because most fund tokens barely trade. Horizon reads issuer NAV through Chainlink inside LlamaRisk's upper and lower bounds; Morpho reads feeds such as "USCC NAV" or "PRIME / WYLDS Exchange Rate"; Euler's KPK vault uses RedStone's daily NAV.
Market prices are hard to build for these assets. Dillon Hanson, Head of BD at DIA, an oracle provider, told the Roundtable in April 2026 that a requirement of "one to two million dollars of liquidity as a bare minimum even to begin getting started on a price feed" is "a very significant bottleneck" (Episode 2 of The Protocol Roundtable). To limit a stale or inflated issuer price, the HINC proposal on Horizon caps NAV growth at 15% APR and requires negative moves to pass through immediately.
Should an issuer list on Aave Horizon, Morpho or Kamino, or launch its own market?
An issuer should start from its holders: trading firms can post Treasury and money market fund tokens as exchange margin. Otherwise, list where the token's chain, redemption speed and holders already fit, and build your own market only when none does. Horizon suits Ethereum Treasury, CLO and credit funds that pass an Aave vote; Morpho suits a token with a curator ready to fund it; Kamino suits Solana issuers.
Listing has its own costs. Horizon asks for a business case, a LlamaRisk assessment, an Aave Labs technical review and a binding Snapshot vote, and a Morpho market needs a curator such as Sentora, Steakhouse or Gauntlet to allocate. A lender that wants its own brand can create a Morpho market and fund it from its own vault without forking any code. A market of your own suits collateral none of them lists, a lender with its own clients or a bank, and it means recruiting lenders yourself: Ondo's Flux Finance had $34.7 million borrowed after more than three years.
Can tokenized stocks be used as loan collateral?
Tokenized stocks are accepted as collateral by a few venues, with larger haircuts than tokenized Treasury funds get. Kraken began accepting 10 tokenized stocks and ETFs as futures and margin collateral in July 2026, with haircuts from 10% for broad-market ETFs to 30% for more volatile stocks, for eligible clients outside the US (Cointelegraph, 4 July 2026).
On Kamino, Superstate's tokenized Forward Industries shares (FWDI) backed $21.8 million at 25% LTV on 18 October 2026. Superstate's tokenized shares can only be held by addresses on its allowlist, including inside a protocol, and Superstate says Kamino use is not available in the US. Kamino and Jupiter Lend also list xStocks shares, and Loopscale's docs list SPYx as collateral.
Does MiCA regulate lending against tokenized funds?
MiCA does not regulate lending against tokenized funds: a tokenized fund unit is a financial instrument under MiFID II, outside MiCA under its Article 2(4)(a), and MiCA's Recital 94 says the regulation "should not address the lending and borrowing of crypto-assets", which leaves loans to national law.
ESMA's Q&A 2883 of 18 June 2026 confirms that a crypto-asset service provider may offer crypto lending, with the client's "prior express and specific consent". The other conditions ESMA attaches, and the license routes for the crypto-asset services around a loan, are set out in our MiCA license routes guide.
Can a bank accept a tokenized fund unit as collateral under Basel rules?
A bank can recognize a tokenized fund unit as collateral under Basel rules only if the untokenized fund would qualify and the token does not add risk. SCO60.30 says "Only Group 1a cryptoassets that are tokenised versions of the instruments included on the list of eligible financial collateral set out in CRE22 may qualify", and CRE22 covers funds with a daily public price.
SCO60.29 adds that banks must assess whether the collateral can be liquidated promptly and confirm that volatility and holding periods under stress are not materially increased. The EU's CRR3 treats tokenized traditional assets as the assets they represent, under a transitional rule. The Basel Committee said on 1 October 2026 that it would give an update on its review of the cryptoasset standard by the end of the year.
Can tokenized money market fund shares be posted as swap margin in the US or UK?
Tokenized money market fund shares can be posted as uncleared swap margin in the US under CFTC staff guidance and in the UK under UK EMIR as the FCA has clarified it. The CFTC Divisions' FAQ of 24 September 2026 says staff "would not object" if the underlying fund meets Regulation 23.156(a)(1)(ix) and the tokens carry the same or functionally equivalent rights.
A Commission rule effective 17 August 2026 had already removed the money market fund "asset transfer restriction". The same FAQ lets futures commission merchants (FCMs) and derivatives clearing organizations (DCOs) invest customer funds in tokenized forms of permitted investments. In the UK, FCA PS26/7 (30 April 2026) confirmed eligible money market funds, "including tokenised MMFs", for uncleared margin under UK EMIR, though respondents said the existing rules "would exclude most widely-used MMFs".
Are there fixed-rate loans against tokenized assets?
Fixed-rate, fixed-term loans against tokenized funds are rare. Morpho Midnight, live since 21 July 2026, offers fixed-rate, fixed-term credit but launched on Base for cbBTC/USDC only, has since added Ethereum, and held $9.2 million on 18 October 2026, with no tokenized-fund collateral. On Solana, Loopscale runs an order book for fixed-rate, fixed-duration loans whose docs list ACRED, ONyc and syrupUSDC as collateral.
Term Finance's auction market held $3.53 million with no Treasury-fund collateral, and Notional V3 wound down after the Balancer exploit of 3 November 2025. No fixed-term venue was lending against tokenized Treasury funds at meaningful size on 19 October 2026.
What are the main risks in lending against tokenized funds?
The main risks in lending against tokenized funds are a price feed that keeps reporting a value the market no longer pays, a liquidation that waits on the issuer's redemption terms, and an issuer's power to freeze or move a position. No incident was found in the RWA markets of Horizon, Morpho or Kamino to 19 October 2026, but the pricing failure has already cost lenders money on other collateral.
In November 2025, Stream Finance's xUSD fell about 77% after an external fund manager lost about $93 million, and on 22 March 2026 an attacker minted about 80 million unbacked Resolv USR through a compromised signing key; in both cases lending markets kept pricing the token at a contract value or an exchange rate. Lenders on Euler, Silo, Morpho and Gearbox had exposure to Stream, and an Arbitrum forum assessment found about $700,000 of realized bad debt in a MEV Capital vault on Morpho. In the Resolv case, 15 Morpho vaults had exposure and Fluid absorbed over $10 million of bad debt.
On liquidation, Kamino warns in its RWA loop documentation that the collateral "may not be liquidatable as rapidly as on-chain assets in a stress scenario". On issuer powers, a Horizon issuer can move a user's position to a new wallet or stop it borrowing more, and the HINC proposal asks how bad debt from an issuer "Executive Action" would be allocated.
Can I fork Aave or Morpho to build a permissioned lending market?
Forking Aave depends on the version, and Morpho needs no fork. Aave V4's license prohibits production use without a waiver or commercial license from Aave Labs; Aave v3.3 to v3.7 are under the Business Source License with a conditional use grant until 6 March 2027 at the latest; and the original 2022 Aave V3 core is now MIT.
The v3.3 to v3.7 use grant bars, among other things, helping to migrate "users and/or funds from the Aave ecosystem", and requires that the user has not deployed a competing Aave fork in the preceding four years, unless the DAO waives it. Euler's vault kit is under the Business Source License with no additional use grant and a stated change date of 24 April 2029. Morpho's core contract is GPL-2.0-or-later and its other files MIT, and on Morpho or Kamino anyone can create an isolated market and run a gated vault without forking. Ondo's Flux Finance, a fork of Compound V2, is a live example of an issuer's own market.
Why is so little borrowed against tokenized Treasury funds?
Little is borrowed against tokenized Treasury funds because the fund's yield barely exceeds the cost of borrowing against it, holders are few and allowlisted, and many funds cannot be redeemed instantly, which leveraged loops need. BUIDL's 7-day yield was 3.69% on rwa.xyz on 18 October 2026, while borrowing RLUSD or GHO on Aave Horizon cost 3.25% APR and USDC 6.30%.
Looping a Treasury fund therefore earns a thin spread at best before any risk. Spark said in July 2025 that the yield on its tokenized T-bills was "below carrying cost" and moved its BUIDL and JTRSY holdings to Grove. BUIDL had 106 holders, and Horizon's first week had 13 RWA supplier wallets. LlamaRisk said the lack of instant redemption "prevents one-click leverage via flashloans". Higher-yielding credit tokens such as PRIME, PST and ONyc carry most of the borrowing instead.
We build lending markets that run under your brand on your own instance of a forked Aave V3 stack: isolated markets for collateral the shared venues do not list, such as one originator's loans, with your own LTV and liquidation settings, NAV oracle adapters, optional KYC/KYB gating and a branded front end. We then maintain and monitor them.
White-label lending markets (Arenas) →Get a proposal
Tell us what you are building. An engineer reads it, we have a short call, and the written proposal follows within one business day.
Budget
An NDA is available from the first message and can cover anything you share. How it works